Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gem"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Very good idea - next test we'll collect the required info (unless someone already has it), mmkay? :) - [[User:Hburger|Hburger]] 10:51, 28 February 2011 (MST) | :Very good idea - next test we'll collect the required info (unless someone already has it), mmkay? :) - [[User:Hburger|Hburger]] 10:51, 28 February 2011 (MST) | ||
:Love this idea! It would make the table a lot more helpful than it is now. - [[User:Amy Pond|Amy Pond]] 14:52, 28 February 2011 (MST) | :Love this idea! It would make the table a lot more helpful than it is now. - [[User:Amy Pond|Amy Pond]] 14:52, 28 February 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | :OMG, I totally forgot to do this during the test! Did anyone else gather the stats? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 20:24, 10 March 2011 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 10 March 2011
I think the vendor sale price should be added to this table. I recall Sadie Wren mentioning that Helga underpays for gems, but I believe the rest of the vendors offer standard prices.--caley dunn 08:50, 27 February 2011 (MST)
- Totally agree. During the last test, I know someone said in the help channel that they were planning to update the table with per-vendor prices. I wish I could remember who it was... - Eglantine 23:43, 27 February 2011 (MST)
- Very good idea - next test we'll collect the required info (unless someone already has it), mmkay? :) - Hburger 10:51, 28 February 2011 (MST)
- Love this idea! It would make the table a lot more helpful than it is now. - Amy Pond 14:52, 28 February 2011 (MST)
- OMG, I totally forgot to do this during the test! Did anyone else gather the stats? - Eglantine 20:24, 10 March 2011 (MST)