Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skill"

From Glitch Forever
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Appropriateness of 'I' as a suffix for initial-level Skills==  
 
==Appropriateness of 'I' as a suffix for initial-level Skills==  
 
Should rank 1 sequence skills have 'I' appended or not? The game calls them Mining I, Gardening I, Better Learning I, etc. [[User:Jellyfish|Jellyfish]] 14:13, 4 March 2011 (MST)
 
Should rank 1 sequence skills have 'I' appended or not? The game calls them Mining I, Gardening I, Better Learning I, etc. [[User:Jellyfish|Jellyfish]] 14:13, 4 March 2011 (MST)
:I believe they should, as just about everything in-game does, from Images to Skill / Achievement requirements. [[User:Kaushka|Kaushka]] 07:24, 7 March 2011 (MST)
+
:*I believe they should, as just about everything in-game does, from Images to Skill / Achievement requirements. [[User:Kaushka|Kaushka]] 07:24, 7 March 2011 (MST)
 +
:*Cosmetic change made on this page - targets still lack ''I'' suffix. [[User:Kaushka|Kaushka]] 08:02, 8 March 2011 (MST)
  
 
==Categories no longer match those used in-game==
 
==Categories no longer match those used in-game==

Revision as of 09:02, 8 March 2011

Appropriateness of 'I' as a suffix for initial-level Skills

Should rank 1 sequence skills have 'I' appended or not? The game calls them Mining I, Gardening I, Better Learning I, etc. Jellyfish 14:13, 4 March 2011 (MST)

  • I believe they should, as just about everything in-game does, from Images to Skill / Achievement requirements. Kaushka 07:24, 7 March 2011 (MST)
  • Cosmetic change made on this page - targets still lack I suffix. Kaushka 08:02, 8 March 2011 (MST)

Categories no longer match those used in-game

The categories used on the Skill page no longer match those of Tiny Specks, and we need to re-examine them here; I believe we should match Tiny Specks' usage as much as possible. Kaushka 07:24, 7 March 2011 (MST)

  • Good point. Shall we start a Google Groups email topic about it to get everyone involved? - Hburger 08:32, 7 March 2011 (MST)
  • Agreeing with Kaushka, a reorganization would be good, in my opinion. A Groups topic would be good too. Mocha 08:55, 7 March 2011 (MST)