Difference between revisions of "Talk:Level"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+1) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Now that Ani has figured out the formula for mood (see [[Metabolics]]) is it still useful to have it in the table? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 20:09, 6 February 2011 (MST) | Now that Ani has figured out the formula for mood (see [[Metabolics]]) is it still useful to have it in the table? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 20:09, 6 February 2011 (MST) | ||
| − | I think we should put it in anyway. It is a bit weird to explain to people. | + | :I think we should put it in anyway. It is a bit weird to explain to people. [[User:Aniloverl|Aniloverl]] |
| + | |||
| + | :Good point, OK - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 21:34, 6 February 2011 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 21:34, 6 February 2011
I have calculated the changes from 104-106% increases between levels. I think 30 might be worng though it screwed up my chart. Aniloverl 15:18, 6 February 2011 (MST)
Now that Ani has figured out the formula for mood (see Metabolics) is it still useful to have it in the table? - Eglantine 20:09, 6 February 2011 (MST)
- I think we should put it in anyway. It is a bit weird to explain to people. Aniloverl
- Good point, OK - Eglantine 21:34, 6 February 2011 (MST)