Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glitch Wiki"
m |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
- I strongly think a 'type' label in all infoboxes would be useful to show what the thing is. For example, I just mixed up a Juicy Carpaccio and thought it was a drink... Type: Food. Type: Drink. Type: powder. Type: tool. It applies universally and is simple yet effective additional info for the infobox. Edit: could be called category. | - I strongly think a 'type' label in all infoboxes would be useful to show what the thing is. For example, I just mixed up a Juicy Carpaccio and thought it was a drink... Type: Food. Type: Drink. Type: powder. Type: tool. It applies universally and is simple yet effective additional info for the infobox. Edit: could be called category. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Um...so the wiki is not viewable by people unless they have an account. So why do we have instructions for getting an account on the main page? --[[User:Bingobar|Bingobar]] 00:43, 21 January 2011 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 01:43, 21 January 2011
Any ideas for what the homepage should look like? I personally love the look of the Team Fortress 2 wiki. --Herp Derp 14:58, 8 January 2011 (MST)
I like the look of [1] - simple, to the point and has good navigation to all key areas.
What are the Glitch colours?
- I strongly think a 'type' label in all infoboxes would be useful to show what the thing is. For example, I just mixed up a Juicy Carpaccio and thought it was a drink... Type: Food. Type: Drink. Type: powder. Type: tool. It applies universally and is simple yet effective additional info for the infobox. Edit: could be called category.
Um...so the wiki is not viewable by people unless they have an account. So why do we have instructions for getting an account on the main page? --Bingobar 00:43, 21 January 2011 (MST)