Difference between revisions of "Talk:Level"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Now that Ani has figured out the formula for mood (see [[Metabolics]]) is it still useful to have it in the table? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 20:09, 6 February 2011 (MST) | Now that Ani has figured out the formula for mood (see [[Metabolics]]) is it still useful to have it in the table? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 20:09, 6 February 2011 (MST) | ||
| − | I think we should put it in anyway. It is a bit weird to explain to people. | + | :I think we should put it in anyway. It is a bit weird to explain to people. [[User:Aniloverl|Aniloverl]] |
| + | |||
| + | :Good point, OK - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 21:34, 6 February 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I agree that mood should still go in the table. It makes it easy for people to look up the information they need if the formula is too confusing. - [[User:Amy Pond|Amy Pond]] 11:17, 7 February 2011 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:17, 7 February 2011
I have calculated the changes from 104-106% increases between levels. I think 30 might be worng though it screwed up my chart. Aniloverl 15:18, 6 February 2011 (MST)
Now that Ani has figured out the formula for mood (see Metabolics) is it still useful to have it in the table? - Eglantine 20:09, 6 February 2011 (MST)
- I think we should put it in anyway. It is a bit weird to explain to people. Aniloverl
- Good point, OK - Eglantine 21:34, 6 February 2011 (MST)
- I agree that mood should still go in the table. It makes it easy for people to look up the information they need if the formula is too confusing. - Amy Pond 11:17, 7 February 2011 (MST)