Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quest"

From Glitch Forever
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I agree with Quintus and Aldaris. Maybe keep the current chart, but on the individual quest page we can explain what triggered the quest? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 13:01, 29 January 2011 (MST)
 
I agree with Quintus and Aldaris. Maybe keep the current chart, but on the individual quest page we can explain what triggered the quest? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 13:01, 29 January 2011 (MST)
 +
 +
P.S. I'm starting to think the current quest table is too complicated: it looked useful, but it takes a long time to read and understand. Really I think only "Name" and "Description" are necessary once we have individual quest pages. In which case maybe bullet points on the overview page would be more readable... - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 17:12, 29 January 2011 (MST)

Revision as of 18:12, 29 January 2011

List of all quests? If so, bullet points on the page or a table? I have plenty of screenshots of quests from the log to start us off: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Hburger 10:01, 24 January 2011 (MST)

So... How are we going to start this off? - Hburger 10:01, 24 January 2011 (MST)

We should specify how or when you get these quests in the first place. Quintus 11:20, 29 January 2011 (MST)

Yes. I'm thinking a chart like the one for drinks, but also a separate page for each individual quest. Aldaris 11:26, 29 January 2011 (MST)

I agree with Quintus and Aldaris. Maybe keep the current chart, but on the individual quest page we can explain what triggered the quest? - Eglantine 13:01, 29 January 2011 (MST)

P.S. I'm starting to think the current quest table is too complicated: it looked useful, but it takes a long time to read and understand. Really I think only "Name" and "Description" are necessary once we have individual quest pages. In which case maybe bullet points on the overview page would be more readable... - Eglantine 17:12, 29 January 2011 (MST)