Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skill"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Appropriateness of 'I' as a suffix for initial-level Skills: Cosmetic change made.) |
(→Categories no longer match those used in-game: Proposed reordering changes made, as well as adding new skills.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*Good point. Shall we start a Google Groups email topic about it to get everyone involved? - [[User:Hburger|Hburger]] 08:32, 7 March 2011 (MST) | *Good point. Shall we start a Google Groups email topic about it to get everyone involved? - [[User:Hburger|Hburger]] 08:32, 7 March 2011 (MST) | ||
*Agreeing with Kaushka, a reorganization would be good, in my opinion. A Groups topic would be good too. [[User:Mocha|Mocha]] 08:55, 7 March 2011 (MST) | *Agreeing with Kaushka, a reorganization would be good, in my opinion. A Groups topic would be good too. [[User:Mocha|Mocha]] 08:55, 7 March 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | :*Changes made. [[User:Kaushka|Kaushka]] 08:04, 8 March 2011 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 09:04, 8 March 2011
Appropriateness of 'I' as a suffix for initial-level Skills
Should rank 1 sequence skills have 'I' appended or not? The game calls them Mining I, Gardening I, Better Learning I, etc. Jellyfish 14:13, 4 March 2011 (MST)
Categories no longer match those used in-game
The categories used on the Skill page no longer match those of Tiny Specks, and we need to re-examine them here; I believe we should match Tiny Specks' usage as much as possible. Kaushka 07:24, 7 March 2011 (MST)
- Good point. Shall we start a Google Groups email topic about it to get everyone involved? - Hburger 08:32, 7 March 2011 (MST)
- Agreeing with Kaushka, a reorganization would be good, in my opinion. A Groups topic would be good too. Mocha 08:55, 7 March 2011 (MST)
- Changes made. Kaushka 08:04, 8 March 2011 (MST)