Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chunk of Sparkly"
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I '''love''' that update, thanks Herp | I '''love''' that update, thanks Herp | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nice!. --[[User:Lelu|Lelu]] 9:15, 9 January 2011 (MST) | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
- Related links can be very useful for readers because they offer quick skipping between pages when trying to determine which is the best for extracting a certain element! | - Related links can be very useful for readers because they offer quick skipping between pages when trying to determine which is the best for extracting a certain element! | ||
| + | |||
| + | True. I'm wondering if there's a better "related links" template of some sort. To Google! --[[User:Herp Derp|Herp Derp]] 17:17, 8 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two I can find are: A big example, like Wikipedia uses: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagles_(band) Eagles_(band) - see bottom of page] and | ||
| + | [http://kol.coldfront.net/thekolwiki/index.php/Ducha_de_oro a small one @ KoL, under 'Zapping']. --[[User:Lelu|Lelu]] 9:23, 9 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I like the one used on Minecraft wiki (however there are so many Glitch items, would it work?): [http://www.minecraftwiki.net/wiki/Item] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:38, 9 January 2011
Infobox
Should we delete the 'Consuming' labels & data etc. from the infobox since it doesn't apply to rocks?
Maybe we replace with a listing of the elements one extracts when grinding this rock. For instance, with Sparkly, 5 red, 1 green, 4 blue, 6 shiny. --Herp Derp 15:33, 8 January 2011 (MST)
What do you think of the update I made to the infobox? Instead of line breaks, I added labels for each element type. --Herp Derp 16:42, 8 January 2011 (MST)
I love that update, thanks Herp
Nice!. --Lelu 9:15, 9 January 2011 (MST)
Related
-Related 'Objects'? 'Items'? What can be the header for related stuff, with links to Dullite, Beryl etc.
I'm not sure that anything "related" is needed. I know the page seems bare, but some pages just won't have that much content. (At least that's my opinion.) --Herp Derp 16:44, 8 January 2011 (MST)
- Related links can be very useful for readers because they offer quick skipping between pages when trying to determine which is the best for extracting a certain element!
True. I'm wondering if there's a better "related links" template of some sort. To Google! --Herp Derp 17:17, 8 January 2011 (MST)
Two I can find are: A big example, like Wikipedia uses: Eagles_(band) - see bottom of page and a small one @ KoL, under 'Zapping'. --Lelu 9:23, 9 January 2011 (MST)
I like the one used on Minecraft wiki (however there are so many Glitch items, would it work?): [1]