Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quest"
(Created page with "List of all quests? If so, bullet points on the page or a table? I have plenty of screenshots of quests from the log to start us off: [http://i.imgur.com/5gyz2.png] [http://i.i...") |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | List of all quests? If so, bullet points on the page or a table? | + | List of all quests? If so, bullet points on the page or a table? I have plenty of screenshots of quests from the log to start us off: [http://i.imgur.com/5gyz2.png] [http://i.imgur.com/VQGc0.png] [http://i.imgur.com/CS2LY.png] [http://i.imgur.com/5gN8C.png] [http://i.imgur.com/KzsAg.png] [http://i.imgur.com/UBw2c.png] [[User:Hburger|Hburger]] 10:01, 24 January 2011 (MST) |
| − | + | So... How are we going to start this off? - [[User:Hburger|Hburger]] 10:01, 24 January 2011 (MST) | |
| − | [ | + | We should specify how or when you get these quests in the first place. [[User:Quintus|Quintus]] 11:20, 29 January 2011 (MST) |
| − | [ | + | |
| − | + | Yes. I'm thinking a chart like the one for drinks, but also a separate page for each individual quest. [[User:Aldaris|Aldaris]] 11:26, 29 January 2011 (MST) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [ | + | I agree with Quintus and Aldaris. Maybe keep the current chart, but on the individual quest page we can explain what triggered the quest? - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 13:01, 29 January 2011 (MST) |
| − | [ | + | |
| + | P.S. I'm starting to think the current quest table is too complicated: it looked useful, but it takes a long time to read and understand. Really I think only "Name" and "Description" are necessary once we have individual quest pages. In which case maybe bullet points on the overview page would be more readable... - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 17:12, 29 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | P.P.S. I've uploaded Hburger's 6 screenshots as quests. See list at [[:Category:Quest]] - [[User:Eglantine|Eglantine]] 21:33, 29 January 2011 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do we want to include the trigger on the table? Like when you learn a skill or first see fireflies, or would that make it too crowded?[[User:Aniloverl|Aniloverl]] 14:52, 2 April 2011 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:52, 2 April 2011
List of all quests? If so, bullet points on the page or a table? I have plenty of screenshots of quests from the log to start us off: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] Hburger 10:01, 24 January 2011 (MST)
![[1]](http://i.imgur.com/5gyz2.png){kind=link}
![[2]](http://i.imgur.com/VQGc0.png){kind=link}
![[3]](http://i.imgur.com/CS2LY.png){kind=link}
![[4]](http://i.imgur.com/5gN8C.png){kind=link}
![[5]](http://i.imgur.com/KzsAg.png){kind=link}
![[6]](http://i.imgur.com/UBw2c.png){kind=link}
So... How are we going to start this off? - Hburger 10:01, 24 January 2011 (MST)
We should specify how or when you get these quests in the first place. Quintus 11:20, 29 January 2011 (MST)
Yes. I'm thinking a chart like the one for drinks, but also a separate page for each individual quest. Aldaris 11:26, 29 January 2011 (MST)
I agree with Quintus and Aldaris. Maybe keep the current chart, but on the individual quest page we can explain what triggered the quest? - Eglantine 13:01, 29 January 2011 (MST)
P.S. I'm starting to think the current quest table is too complicated: it looked useful, but it takes a long time to read and understand. Really I think only "Name" and "Description" are necessary once we have individual quest pages. In which case maybe bullet points on the overview page would be more readable... - Eglantine 17:12, 29 January 2011 (MST)
P.P.S. I've uploaded Hburger's 6 screenshots as quests. See list at Category:Quest - Eglantine 21:33, 29 January 2011 (MST)
Do we want to include the trigger on the table? Like when you learn a skill or first see fireflies, or would that make it too crowded?Aniloverl 14:52, 2 April 2011 (MDT)